FT-CI

For the defeat of the Israeli offensive

No to UN or NATO intervention!

27/07/2006 La Verdad Obrera N° 197

After two weeks of the Israeli offensive in Lebanon,
the battles on the border and the destructure of the
infrastructure continue with the deliberate goal of
terrorizing the civilian population. As this scandal
unfolds, Condoleeza Rice began her diplomatic tour
aiming to gain more time for the Israeli army to
continue using US bombs and weapons to devastate
Lebanon, while grandstanding on a search for a
"permanent and sustainable" cease-fire. During her
journey, she began to talk more insistently about the
formation of an international peace-keeping force that
would take on the difficult task of preventing new
Hezbollah attacks or that would collaborate with the
Lebanese army to do it. Though many doubt the
viability for Israel of these alternatives for
containing the threat of Hezbollah, one shouldn’t
dismiss the possibility that after a cease-fire Israel
would seek to impose some type of international
intervention.

Nevertheless, it’s not yet clear when this moment will
arrive. In the first days of its military campaign,
Israel enjoyed wide international backing which opened
a window of opportunity to qualitatively weaken
Hezbollah, a point which was supported by the US in
its effort to extricate itself from the strategic
impasse it faces in the region as a consequence of the
military quagmire in Iraq. However, as the images of
the destruction of infrastructure and the enormous
suffering of the Lebanese (and Palestinian) masses
spread, that support has been deteriorating. Once
again, Israel is under strong international pressure,
along with its master, the US. Let’s not forget that
the Bush administration remains politically weak. In
this context, even though the US would like to push
ahead toward the defeat of Hezbollah, the poll numbers
and the growing problems in Iraq prevent the US from
supporting Israel indefinitely. These are the
conditions that make the introduction of an
international intervention force worthwile. The US
wants breathe life, at least provisionally, into an
option that the Israeli army, frightened by the high
costs and fatal consequences of the 1982 invasion of
Lebanon, has not been willing to consider. This is
why, at the same time as we redouble our efforts to
defeat Israel’s military offensive, we must make clear
our complete opposition to the deployment of any
military force, whether under the command of the UN or
NATO, on Lebanese soil. A conclusive military victory
for Israel, or, if this is not possible, the
introduction of an imperialist military force in a
buffer zone on the Israel-Lebanon border, would be a
defeat for the masses of the region who only want to
shake off the Israeli hegemony backed up by the money
and arms of US imperialism.

With this perspective we revolutionaries fight to
destroy the source, since its creation, of oppression
and permanent wars in the region: the state of Israel,
a state founded on the expulsion of the indigenous
Arab population and a state that can only maintain
itself on the basis of permanent war and oppression
against the Palestinian masses and the neighboring
Arab countries, as its entire history demonstrates.
Because of this state of war, despite the political
character of Hezbollah, we revolutionaries defend
Hezbollah against the aggression of the zionist state
and we consider its acts of resistance against the
terrorist Israeli state legitimate, at the same time
as we maintain complete political independence from
this radical islamic group. We are for the defeat of
the Israeli aggression against Lebanon, which, if it
were to succeed, would only establish a more
pro-imperialist government which would most likely
accept a major imperialist "peace-keeping"
intervention, once the Israeli army had cleared the
way. Only a revolutionary workers leadership,
independent of all the bourgeois governments of the
region, not only the the friends of Israeli but also
those that today seem to be its enemies as is the case
of Syria and Iran, can be an alternative for the just
aspirations of the masses of the region. We marxist
revolutionaries fight for the destruction of the state
of Israel and insist that a secular, democratic, and
non-racist Palestine is only possible as a socialist
and workers Palestine, where Arabs and Jews can live
together in peace, on all the historic territory of
Palestine (Israel proper and the current Palestinian
territories in the West Bank and Gaza), as part of a
Federation of Socialist Republics of the Middle East.

  • TAGS
Related articles

No hay comentarios a esta nota

Newspaper

  • PTS (Argentina)

  • Actualidad Nacional

    MTS (México)

  • EDITORIAL

    LTS (Venezuela)

  • DOSSIER : Leur démocratie et la nôtre

    CCR NPA (Francia)

  • ContraCorriente Nro42 Suplemento Especial

    Clase contra Clase (Estado Español)

  • Movimento Operário

    MRT (Brasil)

  • LOR-CI (Bolivia) Bolivia Liga Obrera Revolucionaria - Cuarta Internacional Palabra Obrera Abril-Mayo Año 2014 

Ante la entrega de nuestros sindicatos al gobierno

1° de Mayo

Reagrupar y defender la independencia política de los trabajadores Abril-Mayo de 2014 Por derecha y por izquierda

La proimperialista Ley Minera del MAS en la picota

    LOR-CI (Bolivia)

  • PTR (Chile) chile Partido de Trabajadores Revolucionarios Clase contra Clase 

En las recientes elecciones presidenciales, Bachelet alcanzó el 47% de los votos, y Matthei el 25%: deberán pasar a segunda vuelta. La participación electoral fue de solo el 50%. La votación de Bachelet, representa apenas el 22% del total de votantes. 

¿Pero se podrá avanzar en las reformas (cosméticas) anunciadas en su programa? Y en caso de poder hacerlo, ¿serán tales como se esperan en “la calle”? Editorial El Gobierno, el Parlamento y la calle

    PTR (Chile)

  • RIO (Alemania) RIO (Alemania) Revolutionäre Internationalistische Organisation Klasse gegen Klasse 

Nieder mit der EU des Kapitals!

Die Europäische Union präsentiert sich als Vereinigung Europas. Doch diese imperialistische Allianz hilft dem deutschen Kapital, andere Teile Europas und der Welt zu unterwerfen. MarxistInnen kämpfen für die Vereinigten Sozialistischen Staaten von Europa! 

Widerstand im Spanischen Staat 

Am 15. Mai 2011 begannen Jugendliche im Spanischen Staat, öffentliche Plätze zu besetzen. Drei Jahre später, am 22. März 2014, demonstrierten Hunderttausende in Madrid. Was hat sich in diesen drei Jahren verändert? Editorial Nieder mit der EU des Kapitals!

    RIO (Alemania)

  • Liga de la Revolución Socialista (LRS - Costa Rica) Costa Rica LRS En Clave Revolucionaria Noviembre Año 2013 N° 25 

Los cuatro años de gobierno de Laura Chinchilla han estado marcados por la retórica “nacionalista” en relación a Nicaragua: en la primera parte de su mandato prácticamente todo su “plan de gobierno” se centró en la “defensa” de la llamada Isla Calero, para posteriormente, en la etapa final de su administración, centrar su discurso en la “defensa” del conjunto de la provincia de Guanacaste que reclama el gobierno de Daniel Ortega como propia. Solo los abundantes escándalos de corrupción, relacionados con la Autopista San José-Caldera, los casos de ministros que no pagaban impuestos, así como el robo a mansalva durante los trabajos de construcción de la Trocha Fronteriza 1856 le pusieron límite a la retórica del equipo de gobierno, que claramente apostó a rivalizar con el vecino país del norte para encubrir sus negocios al amparo del Estado. martes, 19 de noviembre de 2013 Chovinismo y militarismo en Costa Rica bajo el paraguas del conflicto fronterizo con Nicaragua

    Liga de la Revolución Socialista (LRS - Costa Rica)

  • Grupo de la FT-CI (Uruguay) Uruguay Grupo de la FT-CI Estrategia Revolucionaria 

El año que termina estuvo signado por la mayor conflictividad laboral en más de 15 años. Si bien finalmente la mayoría de los grupos en la negociación salarial parecen llegar a un acuerdo (aún falta cerrar metalúrgicos y otros menos importantes), los mismos son un buen final para el gobierno, ya que, gracias a sus maniobras (y las de la burocracia sindical) pudieron encausar la discusión dentro de los marcos del tope salarial estipulado por el Poder Ejecutivo, utilizando la movilización controlada en los marcos salariales como factor de presión ante las patronales más duras que pujaban por el “0%” de aumento. Entre la lucha de clases, la represión, y las discusiones de los de arriba Construyamos una alternativa revolucionaria para los trabajadores y la juventud

    Grupo de la FT-CI (Uruguay)